Yesterday, we ran a story that went off the charts (at least our charts) on Facebook and Twitter. At first blush, there was nothing too special about the story other than it was about a loaded topic — marriage. What made it so unique? Well, we set it up to succeed:
- The story was rushed out to make it into our morning newsletter — and because it was very new, it was the first time most people saw the story. We had our story up less than an hour after it first broke.
- It had a great SEO headline. We’ve been working on this, and the results are impressive when we use the right words.
- It was written very entertainingly — another thing we’re trying. It led with a joke.
All this seems like common sense. It largely is, but it’s nice to see your theories supported. Speed matters — nobody is going to share a story the 3rd time they’ve seen it. Old news will always under-perform. Words matter — we were on page 1 of Google for a long time with this story for logical, straightforward queries. Style matters — if you haven’t entertained the reader, there’s nearly no chance the reader will want to entertain his or her Facebook friends with your content.
All this has got me wondering: what is the value of the non-viral, less-read content? That sounds like a future post…





Pingback: How Can You Create Viral Content? | SEO Article Expert
Pingback: What I Learned From Guy Richie’s Sherlock Holmes