ispotastory.com: Is Copying Digg Really The Next Big Thing?

Honestly, I don’t really get this.  It’s been 5 years since Digg was founded.  It’s been 4 years since Time Magazine declared user generated content its person of the year.  The web has Reddit, Yahoo Buzz, SlashDot, Mixx, etc. and local clones like the Windy Citizen.  What’s going on?  Does the web really need ispotastory.com?  At this rate, there will be more sites that allow user generated content than there will be willing participants in about 6 weeks.

Reddit Graffiti
Creative Commons License photo credit: blmurch

User generated content was the web’s first big take on user generated traffic.  The Digg model harnessed its reader to bring traffic to the site and it was wildly popular … in 2005.  The web has evolved since then.  Social media companies like Facebook and Twitter took the successes of Digg and abstracted them further.  Discussion on the web could now happen in the reader’s own social sphere instead of the inside the greater Digg community.  This was a huge shift and is now a pain-point for sites like Digg.

Sites like Mashable, CollegeHumor.com, FunnyOrDie.com, and BuzzFeed are the new revolutionaries.  Mashable is very systematic and successful at covering socially-viral stories.  CollegeHumor.com and FunnyOrDie.com make a business of creating viral videos.  They’ve figured out what it takes to replicate viral content successes on the internet … and they don’t need small-time UGC sites to get exposure.  CollegeHumor.com’s CEO even went so far as to say that the myth of users generating good content is the biggest myth of the internet.  Meanwhile, BuzzFeed automates their viral coverage through their widgets — rendering the concept of pushing a button to ‘Digg’ something entirely useless and quaint.

So what’s going to happen to ispotastory.com?  If they can climb up the radar a bit, maybe they’ll get bought by Reddit, but I don’t think that’s likely.  Hopefully it’s a site built to serve a passion and the team has a wildly fun time giving it a go on the internet.  Best of luck.

Posted in Business, The Internets | Tagged , | 4 Comments

The End Of The iPhone Era

I wrote a post recently about how the Kyocera Zio would mark the turning point in the Android v. iPhone battle.  Like a lot of my posts, I submitted it to Reddit, because I love Reddit.  I didn’t convince everybody.

iPhone buyers aren’t going to break their contracts and buy this lower-end phone.  We all know that.  But as the iPhone market goes down-market to build its customer base, cheaper Android phones are going to be a major hurdle.  Why buy the $200 iPhone with 2-year contract and $110/month plan when you can get an Android phone for a fraction of that price (especially if the Android plan includes unlimited data)?  Apple is a one-phone, one-carrier operation.  LG is planning to release 20 Android handsets this year.  There are already Android phones on every major carrier.  This is what Apple is up against.  They can’t win.

It’s the Windows battle all over again.  Apple can win the first few clashes as the fight begins, but once the swarm starts, there’s no way for the closed system to triumph.  The iPhone was able to beat the G1, but it’s got no chance against the Incredible, EVO, Droid, Nexus One, i1, MyTouch, Zio, etc.  The iPhone era is ending.  Retina display isn’t going to save it.

Posted in The Google | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

The Kyocera Zio Will Be The Phone That Buries The iPhone

I like prepaid wireless.  I like Google Android.  I’m bearish on Apple and its future prospects.  Android vs. Apple is Windows vs. Apple and it’s going to end the same way.  The Kyocera Zio could be the last nail in the coffin.

iPhones
Creative Commons License photo credit: Mads Boedker

Face it — Android has all the good buzz.  It used to be the OS defined by what it lacked — multi-touch.  Now it’s the OS with Flash, it’s “open,” and every major manufacturer has a badass phone in the works.  But it won’t be the super phones like the HTC Evo and Droid Incredible that bury Apple — it’ll be the simpler ones, the phones that are good enough.  It will be the Kyocera Zio.

This thing is supposed to be $200 unsubsidized.  That’s insane — 1/2 to 1/3 the price of other smartphones (Google’s Nexus One is $530).  And if it gets on Boost Mobile, watch out.  $50-60 a month is pretty damn attractive — $1,400-1,640 total cost over 2 years compared to $2,500-3,800 for a higher-end phone.  Seriously, cue the iPhone exodus.

And yeah, you can whine about the specs — it IS a cheaper phone.  But it has the same processor speed as the formerly top-of-the-line iPhone 3Gs — 600MHz — and it has a higher resolution screen.  Yes, you will need to buy a big micro SD card to hold all your songs, but, unlike the iPhone, you can replace its battery.  And yeah, you can complain about running Android 1.6, but the user of this phone is either too novice to care about OS fragmentation or savvy enough to upgrade it on his own.  It’s truly good enough, and it will be revolutionary.

Apple is going to hate this phone.

Posted in The Google | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments

Google, Want To Sell More Nexus One Phones? Offer It On Boost Mobile.

When Google first offered its Nexus One phone for sale, it took a very different approach by not tying it to a specific carrier (though in reality is was essentially tied to T-Mobile).  Unfortunately, T-Mobile already had a bunch of Android phones in its lineup (G1, My Touch) that the Nexus One had to compete with.  When Google launched their AT&T version, Motorola’s Backflip beat it to the party.  Verizon was long-rumored to carry the Nexus One, but now it has the HTC Incredible (and Motorola’s Droid before that).  Sprint is now ramping up for the HTC EVO.  Which leaves Google with no real market.  Except the market it should have went after in the first place: prepaid.

big and small
Creative Commons License photo credit: mac morrison

The prepaid market lines up much better with Google’s approach to selling phones.  Prepaid customers already purchase unsubsidized phones, and there’s currently no prepaid phone running Android available in the US.  This is about to change (probably) with Motorola’s i1, but that phone is a lower-end device.

But the prepaid market has a social stigma — these customers are less desirable to mobile phone carriers because they are not locked in.  They can change their plans at any time, switch carriers easily, and spend as little as a few dollars a month.  Because of these factors, the prepaid market is filled with sub-par phones.  Which makes it the perfect market for the Nexus One.

Posted in The Google | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Read Rework

Read Rework.  I’ve told six people about this book today.  I bought the book Tuesday afternoon, started reading it on the bus, went to the Cubs game, read some more at home afterward, and finished it this morning.  It’s that good.

It’s a dead-simple take on the business world written by 37signals founders Jason Fried and David Hansson.  Why is it good?  Well, they mention the genius of Gordon Ramsay’s trim menu and they abhor meetings.  If you need a daily fix, read their Signal vs. Noise blog.

And if you’re like me and you want even more, check out their earlier book, Getting Real, online (note: there’s some overlap with Rework).  Some great tidbits:

Posted in Business | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Easy Implementation of Google Web Fonts

This week Google announced their new web font directory.  Instead of relying on users to have special fonts or resorting to using images, Google makes font replacement super easy with their new open source tool.  I’ve had moderate luck with sIFR in the past, but I like Google’s solution better.  I implemented it on my website this morning, and it couldn’t have been easier.

  1. Add this line of code to the HEAD of your HTML page.  Be sure to grab the code appropriate to the font you want.  This example uses Droid Sans.
  2. Reference the font name in the font stack wherever you want to use the Google web font (ex: font-family: ‘Droid Sans’, Verdana …).  In my case, I applied it to the entire page.

The only thing I don’t like is the font shift when the page loads for the first time.  This plagues all replacement techniques, but Google’s caches well and doesn’t seem to affect subsequent visits.  In my experience, the sIFR solution shifts on every page load which is a deal-breaker.

Helvetica pixels
Creative Commons License photo credit: Sunfox

Let me know what you think in the comments.

Posted in The Google | Tagged , | Leave a comment

CONFIRMED: iPads Are For The Elderly

An elderly California woman walks into an Apple store.  She’s never owned a computer but has saved up $600 for an iPad.  The grandmother pulls out a wad of cash and the cashier says:

‘Sorry, we don’t take cash [for iPads].’

Apple, come on!  This is the iPad’s core market — cater to them.  Read more here.

Posted in Business | Tagged , | Leave a comment

5 Business Lessons From Kitchen Nightmares and Gordon Ramsay

I love Fox’s Kitchen Nightmares because of its insight into humanity.  Yeah, it’s fun to watch shows about food, but Gordon Ramsay’s show is about so much more than that. He’s not just a chef — he’s a psychologist.  He needs to break people from their instinctive path and get them to change.  He needs to convince them that they can respond to their failure and turn it into a success.  His lessons are valuable to all business owners that face challenges.

end of the night
Creative Commons License photo credit: brooklyn

Embrace Change

Convincing an owner that the business needs to change is usually step one.  There has never been an episode where Gordon is flabbergasted that the place is unsuccessful.   It’s never a surprise; there’s always a reason (usually plural).  But the owners tend to fear change because they incorrectly evaluate the risks and rewards.  Gordon has to convince them that prolonged mediocrity will not lead to success.   The owner must change paths to succeed.

Stay Detached

Gordon is able to provide insight for the same reason that consultants are able to provide it to other businesses — they’re both detached.  They are unencumbered by the distractions of history and see a failing business very simply.  If you want to save the cost of a consultant, you can do this yourself.  Avoid the delusion of past success and look at things simply: a restaurant works by selling food for more than it costs to produce.  It’s that simple.  It’s a single equation.  Now build from there.  Are people willing to pay for the current food?  Are there enough of these people?  Etc.

Continually Evaluate Your Assumptions

If you’re not detached, you’ll likely jump to a different set of conclusions than if you are able to stay detached.  One owner switched to cheaper steaks to save money … but they didn’t taste as good so fewer customers were willing to pay for them.  Another put his chef on too high of a pedestal … and the chef was running the place into the ground.  These types of conclusions are tremendously dangerous, but they’re sometimes needed for expediency.  As a business owner, you can’t labor over each decision you’re faced with, but when things get tough, you need to evaluate your old decisions.

Focus On The Basics

Thanks to the FDA, there’s one thing a restaurant has to be: clean.  If you fail at that, it doesn’t matter how great everything else is, because you will be shut down.  What are the absolute basics of your business?  Are you a landscaper with dull lawnmower blades?  When it’s time to rebuild, this is where you need to start.  The goal of all businesses is to sell something for more than it costs you to produce.  Make sure you have all the tools you need to do so.

Consider The Menu

Gordon always changes the menu — and he always makes it shorter.  When faced with failure, the instinct of many is to try to do more — more dishes, more options, more choices.  This never works.  Gordon refocuses restaurants so that they can excel at single things instead of fail at many things.  This is oftentimes the most significant change, but it’s the most difficult to make because it involves the restaurant’s identity.  Should the pasta place evolve into a steakhouse because there’s less competition?  Maybe it should.  Should the ethnic restaurant embrace more modern dishes and techniques that are more approachable to patrons but don’t follow grandma’s recipe?  Maybe it should.  What’s on your menu?  Get rid of what’s not working and focus on what is.

Do you watch Kitchen Nightmares for the same reason?  Have I missed any good lessons?  Leave me a note in the comments.

Posted in Business | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Google Needs Frank Gehry To Topple Apple

Google needs one thing to topple Apple: Frank Gehry (or some other modern architect).

Here’s why:

As a sales story, the Google’s Nexus One was not a success.  It just isn’t selling much (full disclosure: I have one).  And while sales numbers were probably not the primary reason Google built the thing, there’s a lot to learn from the experiment.

Android phones are selling very well.  The current best selling Android device is the Motorola Droid on Verizon (I like the cheaper, keyboard-free Droid Eris and the new HTC Incredible).  The Droid’s ad campaign made the phone cool.  You can pull it out in a bar, and the person next to you will know what it is and hopefully be of the opposite sex and hopefully want to sleep with you.  That’s what good advertising campaigns accomplish … more or less. The Nexus One’s online-only campaign didn’t accomplish this on the same scale as the Droid’s television campaign.

But as advertising campaigns, both have been tremendously nerdy.  They have focused on specs and megapixels and functionality.  The next campaign  needs to focus on Apple’s stronghold: design.  Which brings us to Frank.

Apple customers (at least all the Apple customers I know) think of themselves as design aficionados.  They get hot dreaming about Herman Miller chairs and concrete and steel architecture.  Their phone is an extension of their design sensibilities — like the mock turtlenecks they all wear.  Google needs to exploit this motivator as well.  It’s not just about features.

Picture this: Frank Gehry sitting in his sweeping stainless steel bandshell in Chicago’s Millennium Park.  He says something like this: “Open design is the best design.  A designer must allow others to participate in his sculpture — to play symphonies in his space.  And only by peeling back layers of distraction and excess,  can we can appreciate true elegance.  I’m Frank Gehry, and I use Android.”

DSCN6125
Creative Commons License photo credit: Sweet One

It’s an attack on all things Apple without being an explicit attack on Apple (unlike the Droid’s “iDon’t” campaign).  And it will give the person next to you at the bar a reason to recognize your phone and want to sleep with you.

Posted in The Google | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Trix Are For Kids; iPads Are For Old Men

For a few months now, the old men of the media world have been telling us that the iPad is going to save newspapers and revolutionize media.  Turns out, unsurprisingly, that these old men are the same people that have bought the thing (via Mashable).

The public pitch was that the iPad was going to be so wildly awesome that people wouldn’t be able to get their wallets out fast enough to buy content to run on it.  Newspapers were going to become so engaging and interactive that nobody would dream of reading one on PAPER.

Fire
Creative Commons License photo credit: patrickeasters

But to believe that you had to believe this: there’s a huge un-tapped market of readers out there that are buying neither computers nor newspapers.  They’re sitting around all day, maybe staring at the TV, fearful of computers — but with the means to buy one — in need of a device to fit their needs.  Their needs being a super-newspaper with pictures and videos and text all rolled into a 2-pound package.  This person is my grandfather.  His eyes get tired, so he would love to listen to the paper read to him.  His vision is going, so it’d be great to be able to zoom in on the text.  He’s terrified of computers.  But he’ll never buy an iPad.

The reality is that the iPad is too expensive for the younger reader.  Especially if that younger reader already owns a laptop.  It’s a duplicative device.  It does nothing new for the entire population of computer savvy buyers.  NY Times on my iPad?  I’ll go to the website.  There’s no reason to justify the expense.  It’s a toy.

And as a toy, it’s pretty neat.  But it’s no revolution.  It’s no iPhone.  It’s the Nexus One.  Google’s Nexus One was never about selling a lot of phones, it was about Google getting direct customer feedback and positioning itself as the anti-Apple.  Don’t want the walled garden of Apple and AT&T?  Buy the Google phone unlocked, use it anywhere.  Google needed to enter the mobile market.  Apple needed to enter the tablet market.

Nearly nobody under 30 has an iPad.  It’s a toy for rich men, right now.  And as the old men of the world march towards their funerals, they’ll have their iPads to help them stay informed.  No, the iPad isn’t going to save newspapers.  But it may prolong their lives while we prolong the lives of their customers.

Posted in Media | Tagged | 5 Comments
  • About Paul

    Paul is involved in a number of websites including BARTANNICA.com, a bar review site; Dappered, a men’s fashion site; and WhyYouAreStupid.com (guess what it's about).

    Learn more about Paul on LinkedIn or by reading this blog.

    Don't miss a thing. Subscribe:
    Subscribe to Paul's blog. Subscribe to Paul's blog. Follow Paul on Twitter!


  • Categories

  • BuzzFeed