Warren Is Right Again

Thanks to 37signals for posting a great quote from Warren Buffett (via Venture Beat).

We would rather suffer the visible costs of a few bad decisions than incur the many invisible costs that come from decisions made too slowly – or not at all – because of a stifling bureaucracy. — Warren Buffett

Lesson #2 from the Veature Beat article is to admit mistakes and move on.  And you can’t move on if you can’t move.  It’s certainly easy to say, but it’s oftentimes tremendously difficult to do in many organizations.  Cheers to Warren for calling attention to the value of being agile and able to respond to mistakes quickly.

Posted in Business | Tagged | Leave a comment

Six Reasons Why The Next iPhone Was Intentionally Leaked By Apple

An iPhone walks into a bar. Bartender says, “Sorry, we don’t serve iPhones.” iPhone says, “iPhone? I’m an i-leaked-a-phone-for-publicity-because-Google-is-getting-all-the-press-and-the-ipad-kinda-sucks phone.”

Iphone Dead End
Creative Commons License photo credit: magic_quote

The story is just too far fetched.  A drunk drops his phone, won’t return any calls, then the phone finds its way to Gizmodo.  Bullshit.  Here’s why:

  1. Apple’s iPad buzz is dead and it needed to get back in the headlines.  There was a lot of hype before everybody tried the thing out, but that’s gone.  It’s a big iPod Touch.  We all realize that.  Sure, a lot of suckers bought it, but the revolution didn’t come.  But perhaps that’s because we’re not sitting close enough to the WiFi.
  2. The iPhone allure is dying.  Apple’s products attempt to be luxury, high-end devices (so Apple can charge more).  That gimmick doesn’t work when everybody has one.  If the iPhone is supposed to be the phone of the savvy and successful, you can’t put it in the hands of a Domino’s delivery driver.
  3. The iPhone OS 4 announcement fell flat.  Wallpapers and multi-tasking?  That’s so Android 2.1.  Get with it, Apple.  When it was first released, the iPhone was a revolutionary device, but since then the updates have been incremental and boring.  Mostly because …
  4. Apple can’t compete with HTC, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, etc. all at once.  They competition is just putting phones out too fast for Apple to respond.  Every phone starting with the Motorola Droid has had better specs than the iPhone 3Gs.  Hell, Verizon’s HTC Droid Eris is just as good and $0.01 on Amazon.  HTC alone has released a half-dozen phones in the last few months, all of them more impressive than the 3Gs, and Apple has announced nothing except wallpapers and fake multi-task.  Apple just can’t keep up because …
  5. The burden of the closed system is starting to crush Apple.  The backlash is mounting and it’s just not going to work out in their favor (just like last time when Apple tried this fight with Windows).  Jobs can say that he’s keeping the walls around iTunes to keep out the porn, but that’s a lie.  The walls are up so that Apple makes more money.  And it’s not just the phone and the OS that are strangling Apple.
  6. It’s the network.  A T&T has taken too many hits  for it to recover.  It’s bloodied and wounded and Apple can’t afford to be tied to it any longer, but because AT&T subsidies are so lucrative, Apple has overstayed its welcome and screwed its customers in its own self interest.  The customer base is ripe for rebellion.

So, long story short, Google Android is catching up.  Their growth rate is phenomenal (their market share more than doubled from 11/09-02/10).  The phones running Android are impressive and feature-rich and are found on Verizon’s huge and Sprint’s super-fast networks.  On top of that, they are cheaper.  Price, flexibility, and choice are all stacked against Apple.  They’ve lost this battle before, and their leaked phone ploy shows they realize that they’re losing it again.

Posted in Business, Media, The Google | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How Your Office Kills Productivity With Interruptions And Distractions

I’m a fan of the virtual office and passive communication.  Here, Jason Fried of 37signals agrees.

  • On long hours: “It’s not because there’s 50 hours of work to do, it’s because you don’t work at work anymore.”
  • “If you want to get things done, you have to get rid of the interruptions.”
  • “Managers are the biggest problems because their whole world is built around interruptions.”
  • “[Interruptions are an] arrogant move … [they communicate] whatever I have to ask you is more important than what you’re doing.”
Posted in Business | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Mediaite.com – Who Are They And What Are They Doing?

Introduction

Mediaite.com is the new kid on the block. If you read their marketing literature, it sounds like they’re going after Gawker’s demographic – the media-savvy world, with maybe a little less snark. I took a closer look. Here’s what I found.

Traffic

First off, they’re doing something right. Maybe it’s the Dan Abrams connection, maybe they’re hitting a niche, but their traffic growth is impressive.  Check out their stats on Compete.com:

Mediaite on Compete

What They Say

Here’s what on their about page: “Mediaite is the site for news, information and smart opinions about print, online and broadcast media, offering original and immediate assessments of the latest news as it breaks.”

Then there’s this gimmick: “Mediaite’s ‘Power Grid’ objectively ranks media professionals across a dozen categories based on their real-time relevance. Power Grid rankings rely on an array of metrics, including anything and everything from circulation to Twitter followers to Google buzz depending on the category.”  Snooze.

So, it sounds like they write about the media and they have some chart of power.  Seems pretty focused … maybe a little boring.  Is that what’s on the site?

What’s Published

What do they cover? Here are the stories they ran from 3/23 – 3/24 organized by category (I pulled the headlines from my daily newsletter):

Sports:

  • Woody Johnson Reflects On Death Of His Daughter, Casey Johnson
  • Online Statistics Guru: Computers Are The Sports Reporters Of The Future

Gossip:

  • WATCH: Kelly Cutrone Gives Cheslea Handler Bag Of Vibrators
  • Erin Andrews Effect? Dancing With The Stars Premieres To Huge Ratings
  • (Link to sister site, Styleite) Russian Vogue Dedicates Entire Issue To Naomi Campbell
  • (Link to sister site, Styleite) NYT Photographer Bill Cunningham Readies For His Close-Up
  • (Link to sister site, Styleite) Kelly Osbourne Becomes A Dr. Phil Special Contributor

Politics:

  • VP Joe Biden And Sen. Scott Brown Have A Lunch Date
  • Oh The Irony: Only The Republicans Can Now Save The Public Option
  • Michael Steele Wants To Bring Nancy Pelosi’s “Iron-Fisted Reign” To An End
  • John Boehner’s “No You Can’t” Gets The Inevitable Will.I.Am Remix
  • George W. Bush Wipes Hand On Bill Clinton’s Shirt, After Meeting Haitians
  • Neugebauer: Overwhelmingly Good Responses From ‘Baby Killer’ Remark
  • GOP Compares Health Care Bill To Armageddon; Massive “Debt Asteroid”
  • Daily Obsession: Nancy Pelosi’s Big, Hard Gavel
  • Bush Administration Catches Friendly Fire From Republican Darrell Issa
  • Past Is Prologue: Ronald Reagan On Medicare In 1961…Sound Familiar?
  • Rudy Giuliani Tries To Talk Health Care, Mostly Endorses Torturing War Criminals
  • President Obama Signs Historic Health Care Bill (VIDEO)

Politics in the Media:

  • Rachel Maddow: Are Tea Partiers Using HCR As An Excuse To Get Violent?
  • James Cameron Calls Glenn Beck A “F*cking A**Hole”
  • Scott Brown Seeks Donations For Senate Run Against…Rachel Maddow?
  • Obama Talks About Overseas Childhood, Tickle Fights In Indonesian TV Interview
  • Stephen Baldwin Calls President Obama A Liar on Larry King Live

Just Media, kinda:

  • John King’s Slow Debut, Keith Olbermann’s Big Night Back
  • Bill O’Reilly Talks Rather, Safer, Beck And More During YES Interview
  • F-Bomb Round-Up: How The Media Quoted The Unquotable, Joe Biden
  • Inside the White House Press Corps: Progressive Talk Radio Host Bill Press
  • Huckabee, Geraldo Go Live Saturday Night, Have Top Shows
  • And Now There’s A Big F*cking Website
  • Glenn Beck Explains That He Does, In Fact, Love Jesus

Analysis

In practice, Mediaite appears to be the Huffington Post with a media angle instead of a liberal angle.  It’s a political site for the media-minded.  Even the media stories have a political flavor — O’Reilly, the White House Press Corps, Beck, Biden — it’s all political!

Not to say it’s not genius.  They had five slow months before they exploded.  The internet is a great venue for political content and it’s trending towards a future where there’s a website for every palate.  The media-centric political demographic must have been an un-tapped market that took a few months to find.  Instead of reading Gawker and Huff Po, people can now read Mediaite.  Genius.

Posted in Media | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

It’s TRUE?! My iPhone 4G Joke Posts Gets An Update.

Two months after my iPhone 4Gs joke post, Mashable posts this: Sprint Makes your iPhone 4G.

This can only mean one thing.  Apple will release the iJobs CEO robot shortly too.  Watch out, world!

Posted in Business, Media | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Looking at the Tonight Show’s Conan / Jay Battle from a Political Perspective

As happy as I am to see Conan O’Brien on Twitter and the rise of Team CoCo, I’m saddened by the way he was ushered off NBC.  When everything went down, there were two stories that came forward as explanations:

  1. NBC’s — Conan’s ratings are poor, therefore we cannot afford to continue.
  2. Conan’s — Network incompetence is hurting the show, we’ll be able to figure it out with more time.

In hindsight, both contained some truth, but incompetence played a fairly big role in Conan’s failure.  Here’s how a little different thinking would have allowed him to succeed.

A TV Exec’s Dream

The hope was simple: bring in Conan and attract a younger audience; spin off Jay and grow his older audience with an earlier show.  That may make perfect logical sense to a TV executive — create two hit shows to double traffic.  But if you ask any political analyst, it is, as Sarah Palin would say, retarded.

The Political Reality

What NBC basically engineered was a Gore / Nader or a Bush / Perot situation.  They created a viable third party that siphoned votes from the main players.  People that would have chosen Conan’s Tonight Show if given two options were given a third option — Jay’s earlier show.  This group abandoned Conan’s show and didn’t stick around to watch more comedy later in the evening.   Jay’s ratings were abysmally low, but if added to Conan’s they would have likely put him ahead in the Dave vs. Conan battle.  By allowing Jay to have an earlier show, NBC ensured Conan’s failure.  And by fracturing the NBC audience, they ensured more people would give David Letterman another look.

And all this fits with the way the Tonight Show was handed off last time.  Johnny Carson didn’t spin off into an earlier slot — he turned into a recluse and was nowhere to be found.

So Conan, sorry man.  Can’t wait to catch your live show.

Get tickets to see Conan OBrien live

Get tickets to see Conan O'Brien live

Posted in Media, Pop Culture | Tagged , | 3 Comments

The Future Of Reading | What Beer Can Teach Us That Fortune Magazine Can’t

Fortune has an interesting article in this month’s issue about the future of reading.  A few industry experts lend their opinions on where things are going in the media world and what will become of companies like The New York Times and Tribune Co.  Many idealize the tablet, and much like a god-image, fantasize about their personalized ideal of what it may be.  Like a deity, they expect it to bring salvation. Others take a more rational approach — the world is changing and the tablet isn’t a savior.  I’ll take the beer goggle approach.

PintGlassFancy
Creative Commons License photo credit: hotcactuspepper

The Start Of The Microbrewery Revolution

The beer shake-up started around the 70s, when consumers started to revolt against the macrobreweries (Budweiser, Miller, Coors).  These companies produced, and continue to produce, very inoffensive and inexpensive beer. And as the big boys grew, they bought and consolidated their competitors, centralizing production, cutting costs, and providing the catalyst for revolt.  They followed the success of Coke and Pepsi — consolidation and uniformity were their selling points.

For many, there were few or no alternatives.  However, globalization and tourism increased the exposure of alternative beers.  “Why can’t I drink beer like the beer in Belgium?” consumers asked.  Grumblings began.  And technology stepped in to solve the problem — home-brew kits. Consumers, not driven by cost concerns, started to make their own beer.

The Growth Of The Market

Successful home-brewers started to expand.  Their friends liked their beer.  Their friends’ friends liked their beer.  “Could they start to sell this beer?” they wondered, and they gave it a try.  If you look at the big names in microbrewing — including Sprecher, Goose Island, Brooklyn — they all started around the same time.  The incubation of this idea happened across the country.

Fast forward a few decades and I can get Brooklyn Brewery beer in Chicago.  I can buy Colorado’s Fat Tire Amber Ale at the corner store.  And new guys keep entering the market — in Chicago we have Metropolitan Brewery along with Half Acre now challenging the incumbent micro, Goose Island.

The Macros Respond

The growth in this consumer-driven market is where the action is and the big boys want a piece too.  Budweiser released American Ale a few years ago to directly compete with microbrewery ales.  In addition to new products, the macros are reintroducing long-dead names like Schlitz and Stroh.  They’re making every attempt to appear de-centralized and non-homogenized.  They’re flooding the market with brands, because the future is no longer a single beer — it’s a beer for every palate and region.  It’s the wine model, not the cola model.

What Can The Media Industry Learn?

The media industry is going through a similar revolution.  The future was once a single, centralized news source, but that’s no longer the case.  Technology stepped in and unhappy consumers have mucked everything up.  Like a home-brewer making his own stout instead of buying Guinness, anybody with $100 and a free weekend can become a media entity on the internet.  The established companies don’t know how to respond.

One response is restricting content (tablets, apps, fee-based consuption) — and it’s a ridiculous idea as soon as you translate it into the beer equivalent — the Budweiser store experience, the only place you can enjoy the cool, crisp flavor of Bud Light, complete with specially-designed chairs and TVs to enhance the user experience.

Another response is to allow customization — tailor the CNN experience to fit YOU, send us your recipe and we’ll make your beer.  But in a sea of infinite choices, my ideal news and beer flavor already exists (and I probably don’t even know what I like).  The extreme example of this approach is to build a site entirely on the contributions of your readers — the Digg model.  Have something we should read?  Share it with the site’s community.  But social sites like Facebook and Twitter have taken the need for ‘community’ out of the equation.  I don’t need validation from faceless Digg readers; I can get that from my friends on Facebook.

The most promising is to de-centralize, or at least appear to de-centralize, so that you can more directly compete with your challengers — like the release of American Ale.  This seems to be the way to go.  AOL’s Engadget competes with both the NYT tech section and sites like BoyGeniusReport and Gizmodo.  Nobody is directly challenging a big player — there’s no New New York Times — the challengers are going after the weak points.  The Huffington Post is a great example: Your news not liberal enough?  Get it here.  Not conservative enough?  Try Fox.

So that’s my pick on the future — the wine model — a flavor for every palate.

Posted in Booze, Business, Media | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

What’s Going On In The Media World?

The New York Times is bankrupt.  Gawker growth is flat.  Digg, the next big thing, is stumbling and changing.  Meanwhile, Mashable might get bought up by AOL (or is it Aol?).  The Huffington Post became a legit source of news.  And the iPad is going to solve everything.  The new media is replacing the old media, and it’s getting its ass kicked by the new, new media.  What the hell is going on?  Well, let’s look.

Online, it’s best to be female

Over the last year, Huffington Post traffic is up 118% and the Daily Beast’s is up 270% (check out compete.com for numbers).  Conrad Black is in jail, Arthur Sulzberger is bankrupt (along with Sam Zell), and Rupert Murdoch has never surfed the information superhighway.  Sex sells.

P1060709
Creative Commons License photo credit: priceyeah

Technology doesn’t matter, even on your iPhone

Mashable uses WordPress; HuffPo uses Moveable Type.  You don’t need to go custom to succeed.  Reader’s don’t care how your content is organized; they only want to read it quickly and easily.  In fact, it’s probably better to use a canned solution — save some money (just don’t spend it on an iPhone app).

Who has an awesome iPhone app?  NYT, AP, Chicago Tribune … bankrupt, old-media newspapers.  The Daily Beast doesn’t even have one.  Mashable’s is odd and clunky.  HuffPo has one that seems to be somewhat popular.  Only the NYT is hoping for the iPad to save it.  A simple mobile site is enough.

The future of mobile media isn’t a repackaged, miniaturized newspaper (or magazine, sorry Esquire).  It needs more reach than that.

Social reach trumps mobile reach

Digg just realized that Facebook and Twitter matter.  The web is real-time and you don’t need user effort to measure it.  Look at BuzzFeed.  They’re the Digg of today and nobody needs to vote to bubble things up — it just happens.  Social networks make that possible — reading and sharing determine popularity.

Mashable focuses on Twitter and Facebook.  Huff Po was an early Digg adopter, then moved to Facebook Connected social news (now including Yahoo, Google, and Twitter integration).  The Daily Beast is heavily invested in email newsletters.  All three have realized that integrating into another facet of a reader’s online life leads to increased readership.  Sure, David Carr has 244,000 Twitter followers and the New York Times has 2.3M but Mashable has 2M too — and guess which company has lower overhead.  Every story Mashable posts is a social home run.  Successful sites are harnessing the power of user-generated traffic.  The old boys are not.

The widget communitistas are dead

To each according to his patience, from each according to his widgets.  Widgets were the future in 2008.  “Customized” homepages, like those offered by Netvibes and PageFlakes, are impossible to differentiate, easy to replicate, and worthless.  Customization isn’t the future.  The future is filled with a site that fits everyone — given an infinite number of options, your dream site is likely out there waiting for you.  Think about clothing — do you buy custom shirts?  Nope, you get them from the Gap.

Conclusion

So that’s it: be female, don’t worry about tech, forget about apps, focus on social, and hit a niche without customization.  Simple!

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Super Bowl Update: No Word On Boost Mobile Android Phone … Yet

Rumor was that the Boost Mobile shuffle commercial would introduce a new Google Android phone in the line-up — the Opus One.  Didn’t happen.  Will they have another commercial?  One can hope.  $50 monthly unlimited would be pretty tempting.

Posted in The Google, The Internets | Tagged , | Leave a comment

User Generated Traffic Is The Next Big Thing

Back in the old days of the internet, forums reigned supreme.  There were forums for gamers, forums for musicians, and forums for fetishes.  As the internet grew, you could converse with people from around the world that shared your interests. Before the internet, you had to work to find people interested in your hobbies.  You had to meet face-to-face to talk with your friends.  Everybody was now a potential friend.

Then, somebody had the genius idea to turn each piece of content into a mini-forum — comments were born!  I post something on my blog, the readers discuss, I participate, and we’re one big happy family that turns into a billion clones over night.

The Digg model followed.  Why go through the effort of creating content when all you really need is the discussion — the readers?  Instead, the site was a community center and anybody could bring up any topic at the community discussion as long as they went through the effort of bringing it up.  Instead of getting everybody to discuss the latest New York Times article on NYTimes.com, some of the discussion was siphoned off to Digg, Reddit, Mixx, etc.  The discussion was no longer owned by the content producer.  The discussion was part of the community.

Digg is now faltering as its centralized-community model crumbles to the customized-community model.  Why should I discuss the latest news with a bunch of trolls on Digg when I can discuss it with my friends on Facebook?  I don’t care what LuvPalin_2012 thinks about the latest news in Iraq.  I care what my friends think.  I’d rather discuss it with them.

And this makes it tremendously more difficult for content producers to benefit (get pageviews) from the discussion happening in the community.  Instead of a single Digg link that drives thousands of visits, producers need hundreds of Facebook links or Twitter tweets to show up in hundreds of their reader’s micro-communities.  But if content producers can harness these communities to drive traffic, they’ll be on the cusp of the next big thing.  Mashable is already there.

So that’s the shake-up we’re in.  Facebook has already replaced Digg and is now challenging Google.  Facebook, or its successor, is going to win.

Posted in Business, The Google, The Internets | Tagged , , | 2 Comments
  • About Paul

    Paul is involved in a number of websites including BARTANNICA.com, a bar review site; Dappered, a men’s fashion site; and WhyYouAreStupid.com (guess what it's about).

    Learn more about Paul on LinkedIn or by reading this blog.

    Don't miss a thing. Subscribe:
    Subscribe to Paul's blog. Subscribe to Paul's blog. Follow Paul on Twitter!


  • Categories

  • BuzzFeed